Top

Vegas betting odds iPhone comes to Verizon, Sprint, or T-Mobile

June 3, 2010   by  

Forces are aligning anew which make it seemingly more clear than ever that the iPhone will eventually be available through more than one carrier in the U.S., ranging from AT&T’s desperate attempt to limit data use by new iPhone users, to Verizon’s too-carefully chosen recent words in which said that it didn’t plan to support any Apple products in the “immediate future.” But while there’s no indication that next week’s rollout of the next iPhone will involve anyone but AT&T, here are Beatweek’s best “Vegas style” betting odds that the iPhone finds its way to each of Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile by the end of 2010.

Verizon: 67% It’s the obvious choice because it’s the largest U.S. carrier not to have the iPhone, and its users (either by desire or via sheer numbers) have been the loudest about wanting the device.

Working in favor of a Verizon iPhone: Current Verizon users come out of the woodwork to all buy an iPhone. Apple claims dominant majority marketshare of the U.S. smartphone industry within months. Verizon makes lots and lots of money. It makes too much sense for the companies to not do eventually. And Verizon can’t be so deluded as to think that its Droid has a long term mainstream future. Here’s why we think a Verizon iPhone needs to be Apple’s priority.

Working against it: Any Verizon iPhone in 2010 would have to be CDMA, which means either an entirely separate “Verizon iPhone” which wouldn’t be compatible with any other network, or a hybrid iPhone model with multiple receiver technologies inside which would waste precious space which could have otherwise been devoted to a new iPhone feature.

Sprint: 22% It’s the one U.S. carrier whose CEO has a name everyone knows, as Dan Hesse has taken to the airwaves himself to advertise that despite not offering any phones that anyone wants, Sprint does offer the lowest monthly rates on phones that no one wants.

Working in favor of a Sprint iPhone: When your only remaining marketing strategy is to slash your prices, you’re in trouble. The iPhone could be a boon for Sprint, even if the terms of the deal were more favorable to Apple.

Working against it: The Palm Pre was massive flop, but now that HP has acquired Palm, will Sprint give HP a shot at getting the Pre right with the next generation, before going running into the arms of a competitor?

T-Mobile: 14% Outside of its own userbase, most people only know three words about T-Mobile: Catherine Zeta Jones.

Working in favor of and against a T-Mobile iPhone: How many T-Mobile users do you even know? It seems unlikely that Apple’s first iPhone foray outside the arms of AT&T would be with such an obscure carrier – unless it was as a trial run for a future Verizon iPhone launch.

Notes: These odds merely represent our best educated guesses. They add up to slightly more than 100% because we believe there’s a very slight chance that the iPhone could end up on more than one new carrier before the end of the year (although if it’s Verizon, we would expect that to be an exclusive). Only allow these odds to impact your buying decisions to the extent that you agree or disagree with the reasoning; we have no inside information of any kind. Whatever you do, don’t place actual monetary wagers. Seriously, they’re just cellphone carriers.

Oh and by the way, the iPhone expanding to additional carriers would not mean that the iPhone would no longer be available on AT&T, to existing or new customers. We wouldn’t expect that to happen any time soon or far.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

This is what happens when you don't think globally. T-mobile is huge in Europe. Thomas Weisel analyst Doug Reid says, "Apple wants to move away from exclusivity; T-Mobile would achieve this for Apple in the U.S.,". Notably, Apple already sells phones through Germany's T-Mobile unit. "The model for selling the iPhone on more than one carrier comes from outside the U.S. also. O2, now the largest carrier in the U.K., had the iPhone exclusivity until a month ago. Orange U.K. then sold 30,000 iPhones in the first weekend of carrying the device, and Vodafone will sell the iPhone starting January. In addition, T-Mobile UK and Orange are to merge, which will create the largest UK network, also carrying the iPhone. T-Mobile in Germany also sells the iPhone.With the foreign examples as a precedent, the multi-carrier iPhone model is out there. Whether Apple will bring home this model though, it is yet to be seen."It's all speculation at this point but I wouldn't rule out someone other than the #1 and #2 carriers in the US getting the iPhone nod.

The focus of the article is clearly on the fate of the iPhone in the U.S.. All of T-Mobile's non-U.S. customers in the world won't change the fact that iPhone adoption in the U.S. is being held back by the fact that it's only available on one major U.S. carrier. And yes, T-Mobile is so obscure in the U.S. that adding the iPhone to T-Mobile in the U.S. won't significantly affect U.S. iPhone marketshare one way or the other.

I am a sprint customer. I am very satisfied with Sprint's service. I would love for sprint to get an iPhone. Just because they offer the lowest prices on plans doesn't mean they are an awful company. Many people appreciate the fact that a cell company would be willing to drop their prices. I believe a lot of Sprint customers would like an iphone. The evo requires $10 more a month for the 4g speed even in places that don't get that luxury yet. So please, Apple, consider allowing Sprint to have the iPhone with the company.

What are you talking about when you say "And Verizon can’t be so deluded as to think that its Droid has a long term mainstream future." Android is currently beating the iphone in market share and its growing bigger and bigger every day.

How can you call it misinformation when NPD releases that information...

Those That want a simple phone choose iphone. As a former iphone fanboy I was all for it. But wants I played with the droid and saw how open it was and all the things I could do with it I choose not to buy another overpriced apple product again. Drop the price lose that restrictions and you will win more people over. But then again their products are designed for people with no technological background to be able to pick it up and play with it with no problem. I can give an ipad to grandma and she could master it in 5 mins. That is the idea, the device will not allow her to mess it up. It is simple it is restrictive, it is for those that one simple things. Those that want a more advanced device go android.

http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100510....Its not misinformation dude!

Funny since Android is now number 2 only behind RIM in Us mobile OS's. Who's the deluded one now?

Fair warning to all commenters: random Droid cheerleading is irrelevant to this article and will be removed. False statements about iPhone vs Android marketshare will also be removed. We don't allow this site to be used for the spread of misinformation.

So you are saying that Android isn't out selling the iPhone? You are delusional then!

http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100510....Its not misinformation. Android IS outselling iPhone in the US Market. Get with the times

Seriously sad of you....you delete truth.http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_100510....This should be proof enough to any reader that Android is outselling the iPhone in the US market. You win though...I don't have the time to sit on your page and try to bring truth to your readers. Just know that even though you want the iPhone on Verizon, it won't happen anytime soon. VZW passed on Apple once when there was no competition for it, and now they have Android which not only competes, but outperforms your favorite phone. I still just can't believe you would delete peoples comments that contradict your statements....be an adult and allow discussion.

You're deleting any comment, my inbox says 55 replies and you're only showing 9. This site is a joke, and I'll be sure to never waste my time here again.

While I find this article a little offensive as an Android phone owner, I do understand the logic behind the discussion. Apple NEEDS to branch away from ATT as its single carrier. The problem here is that VZW doesn't really need the iPhone, and if anyone thinks back a little it was Apples first choice for cell phone carrier (Verizon passed then and would do so again). Verizon gave apple the bird because Apple wanted too much control over pricing and the like, now VZW has Android phones which in most cases are on par with the iphones, and in other cases surpass the iPhone in both hardware and software capabilities. As much as Apple needs VZW.....i don't see VZW needing Apple. *** Why did you delete this, I haven't been rude or anything, I've simply given a counter argument??? ***

have you seen this? http://gizmodo.com/5554293/10-things-android-do...beatweek keeps deleting posts that are against their loved iphone, bunch of fanbois

Android is taking off and can do more than the iPhone OS. It gives people OPTIONS and CHOICE. I can get a Motorola, an HTC, an LG, a Samsung, a Dell, etc depending on what options I want. Do I want a keyboard? Maybe a huge screen? Maybe I want a small compact screen. I have choices. Maybe I want HTCs UI or Samsungs or Motorolas. I can also go to any carrier I want, they all have Android phones! They all offer different options. So many choices and they all run the same apps!With Apple you have ONE choice. One phone, one variation of OS.THAT is why Android is beating Apple.

"Current Verizon users come out of the woodwork to all buy an iPhone." not true. I wouldn't. I don't own one fruity product. I want more freedom in my products. My Droid works wonderful.

some Verizon customers want an iPhone, sure, but we have been the loudest? Hardly, we already have several good alternatives to the iPhone. CDMA works with Sprint too. Your Vegas odds don't add up to a 100% lol! 67+22+14=103? However. it is a free country, and anyone should have the right to speak there POV. Good day sir.

It was clearly explained in the article as to why the percentages added up to slightly more than one hundred percent. People who don't read the entire article first don't get to comment on it.

Fair enough, I just though a 100% means a whole, complete, can go no further, but I get what you are saying:)

That would only be the case if one of the above happening necessitated that the other two NOT happen. For instance only one team can win the super bowl, so the combined odds for all 32 NFL teams have to add up to a total of exactly 100%. It doesn't apply when you're referring to events that aren't mutually exclusive.For example, if I say there's a 50% chance I'll have a hamburger as part of my dinner, a 40% chance I'll have french fries as part of my dinner, and an 80% chance I'll have a mountain dew as part of my dinner, that's all valid even though it seemingly adds up to way more than 100%.

I got you, it makes since, but my compartmentalized thinking sometimes gets the better of me:)

Notice how he keeps deleting comments that go against the iPhone. Not that the Android really has anything to do with this article.Tool!!!!

Uh...EVO 4G, ever heard of it?

Check your facts D-Bag!! Maybe run numbers before you post an uninformed article

While I find this article a little offensive as an Android phone owner, I do understand the logic behind the discussion. Apple NEEDS to branch away from ATT as its single carrier. The problem here is that VZW doesn't really need the iPhone, and if anyone thinks back a little it was Apples first choice for cell phone carrier (Verizon passed then and would do so again). Verizon gave apple the bird because Apple wanted too much control over pricing and the like, now VZW has Android phones which in most cases are on par with the iphones, and in other cases surpass the iPhone in both hardware and software capabilities. As much as Apple needs VZW.....i don't see VZW needing Apple.

android is here to stay. this article is just from another sore iphone loser

This guy is obviously an idiot.

I agree Apple was hasty in its decision for long commitment to a single carrier. My vote, a Verizon iphone makes the most sense at this point as is long over due. But the author should better clarify the statement "Verizon can’t be so deluded as to think that its Droid has a long term mainstream future". That is similar to the assertion that Firefox, Chrome, or Google (Android is Google's baby, of course) has no long term mainstream future. People may have been slow to adopt but once low-cost, feature-rich alternate offerings are available, the result is generally one of wide acceptance. So even if you go by the early numbers, Android is already "mainstream."

imho I think Google's Android OS is here to stay. If VZW's trademark of "droid" sticking around is in question, I guess that's another topic. Although it would be nice for stockholders if business agreement could be made, but VZW will do just fine with or w/o the i-device and vice versus.

I strongly disagree with your article, because it's just plain wrong...lol. Android has just surpassed the iPhone here in the US and how can it not be here to stay?!?!? It's like the largest growing platform in electronics!!!! People these days......

iPhone sucks anyway. As a Verizon customer I could care less about this tech. Android does everything that Apple has touted, I don't buy a brand, I buy a product....and Android is the superior product.

iPhone sucks anyway. As a Verizon customer I could care less about this tech. Android does everything that Apple has touted, I don't buy a brand, I buy a product....and Android is the superior product.

Don't say anything bad about the iPhone, or good about another device, because this author is blinded by his favoritism and will delete your post. What a coward.

Really? You deleted my post? A post that was well thought out and presented factual information? Granted it wasn't a pro iPhone post but it was true nonetheless.

Guys, chillax. iPhone app censorship is so normal to iPhone users that they naturally just censor the rest of their lives, too.

Isn't the android os beating iphone?Open your eyes fanboy

Come to the Dark Side!! We have Flash and Multi-Tasking!

Don't forget Frozen Yogurt!

After using the Droid, I have no desire to switch to iPhone. I'm already on the best network (Verizon), using the best, most open OS. Why change?

Android is outselling iphone now. Deal with it fanboy. Go ahead and delete our comments. I'll just post them on Twitter asking why you're censoring comments section here.

"Apple claims dominant majority marketshare of the U.S. smartphone industry within months. Verizon makes lots and lots of money. It makes too much sense for the companies to not do eventually. And Verizon can’t be so deluded as to think that its Droid has a long term mainstream future. "Really? I guess you missed the memo that Android now holds the top spot in the US over the iPhone? It is also continuing to grow at almost an exponential rate both in North America and abroad. As an operating system Android is far more powerful, flexible and customizable than iPhone OS can ever hope to be, including iPhone OS 4. When talking hardware Android devices will always be one if not two generations beyond what Apple offers in the iPhone. Not only that but the ability to have an Android device on whichever carrier you choose in a form factor that fits you is almost a given at this point. Whereas with Apple they know what's best and offer ONE form factor. Hell you can't even add a MicroSD card or change the battery on an iPhone! Last but not least is the open app. market that Android has. This is something that iPhone devs could only wish for and it seems like more and more are coming to Android as it is already at 60k apps. Android is the future and everyone + dog knows this... well... except you.

Why tell us to comment if we can't...... get therapy

android phones are topping the charts go android!!!

The "verizon iphone" would not have to be exclusive because of the cdma technology as sprint is also cdma (plus you would have potential for the vodafone network in europe as well). I'm not quite sure how rolling it out on t-mobile would be a trial run for verizon, as once again verizon is cdma, t-mobile is gsm, just a different band then att (plus half the people i know on t-mobile already have iphones running "edge" only).. just saying. Either way I would not give up my incredible for an iphone, on any carrier period

iPhone sucks anyway. As a Verizon customer I could care less about this tech. Android does everything that Apple has touted, I don't buy a brand, I buy a product....and Android is the superior product.

Iphone has been beaten obviously in functionality with the software by Android. I had an Iphone and got sick of waiting for them to let me send a picture messege.. A picture messege?!?!?!?! Cmon I can buy a trackphone and send a picture why did it take the Iphone 2 years to be able to do simple phone tasks? Also a good friend of mine already posted something like this here and the post was removed so it looks like they just want people to keep thinking the Iphone is better.

Bottom