Top

Apple buys Lala, kills it off, teaches geek tech pundits a lesson

April 30, 2010   by  

When Apple acquired a small streaming music firm called Lala late last year, some tech pundits who’ve believed all along that music rental services are the future (despite mountains of evidence to the contrary) proclaimed that it signaled that Apple was finally ready to junk its massively successful music sales strategy in iTunes, in favor of a rental model that has never worked in history of recorded music. Even Apple publicly stated that it had purchased Lala strictly because it liked the company’s engineering talent and wanted to acquire said engineers, the geek pundits kept at it about how it as all some kind of secret plan to shift iTunes to a music rental model However, to the surprise of no one but those pundits, Apple announced today that it is in fact shutting down the Lala service. The twelve people who were actually using it will each receive an equivalent about of iTunes credit to fulfill the services they had already purchased from the company.

When Apple first acquired Lala last year, this is exactly the scenario we predicted; we won’t say “we told you so” but then again nor are we expecting the geek tech pundits to back down on their continued insistence that music rental is the future despite the fact that the general public has already clearly indicated that music sales are the only business model in the music industry with any potential for mainstream success.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

It seems like the author of this post is the only one defending his/her stance. Everyone is upset about losing this great service...but all the author says is how much a waste of time "rent to own" is. How much a waste of time lala was.well, lala was more than $.10/song for me. They had an amazing music discovery service going. It was social. I could see what my friends were listening to, share what i was listening to, see what was popular, whatever...you could browse around for hours. And here's the big one...listen to an entire album once...FOR FREE! Then if you liked it each song cost $.10. AMAZING. The UI was matchless when compared to anything else out there. It was a breeze navigating around lala. I was also a member of the iphone app beta group. The app was awesome and made lala the perfect service. I really could listen to my music anywhere. I could listen to almost any song anywhere....because the app let you add songs on the fly. Many times I'd be riding in the car with friends and they would want to hear some old song I didn't have...well, we just searched for it and played it via lala. so, mr/ms article writer...i don't know what this "rent to own" stuff is all about but lala was the best thing to happen to music on the internet in a long time (since pirating music). I guess they weren't making money. Probably just because the average person doesn't like to buy things on the internet that are so abstract. That day will change and hopefully services like lala will thrive. I will NOT buy music from itunes...$1.30/song?! What a joke. I'll stick with local record shops till another lala comes around.

WTF? Agh! I hate you Apple! I'd rather deal with my crappy windows 7 than buy an Apple after this. It's so...f*cked up! >:/ Lala had less than 2m users, why not just let it go. Were they that much of a threat? I guess when they were selling songs for .10 it makes sense.. agh!

Lala was going out of business, so THEY approached Apple about a buyout; they would have been out of business otherwise. What part about that do you not understand?

Thanks for crushing my favorite music site, Apple. Time to torrent, if you pay $1.29 a song on iTunes you're totally retarded.

So following the law instead of stealing is "totally retarded"? Nice picture you just painted of yourself there.

Thanks for your concern. Sorry, but I'm not going to be abused by a company just because "well I guess there's no other way, I'd better give all my money to Apple." Have fun following the law yourself, and spending an obscene amount of money for the music you enjoy.

If you had any idea what an amoral ass you sound like in the above post, you'd be in line for some serious soul searching.

Speaking of being an ass, I just read your combative posts in response to all of the posts in this comment section .

Well this is fun, I had a comment here that apparently never got posted. It had to do with the fact that I'm being called an ass by a person who is creating conflict with their response to every post in this section.

I refused to pay for music for a long time.However, I was actually paying the .10 Lala charged. I'm sure the suits at the recording companies would rather have my .10 per song than nothing at all. Well, they can thank Apple for my refusal to pay again! Those totalitarian a*sholes! This is wrong on SO many levels! I hate you Apple! I'd rather deal with my inferior windows 7 than buy a mac after this! agh!!! >:/

wow. yet another reason I hate apple, they need anti-trust laws pulled on them

Why, because they acquired a dying company and shut down a service that almost no one was using anyway?

Um, they were NOT a dying company! Their service rocked and they were on their way up...

Sorry, despite your delusions about music rentals, the facts clearly state that Lala was losing money, going out of business, and APPROACHED APPLE about a buyout. There is other imaginary version of history that you get to post here just to suit your delusions. Now kindly go away.

Steve Jobs strikes again why? $$$$$$$$$....Capitalism. Instead of the whole "clean honest white" theme that Apple likes to follow they should represent & feature themselves in their true color: ICE-COLD-BLACK(HEART) with horns editions all around. The BSD (OSx's underlying OS or basis) mascot already has horns by the way. Need I say more?

This seems extremely poorly researched... The AP article (haha who would have ever thought the AP would be better on tech things than the smaller guys) has pretty good looking evidence Apple is working towards running their own version of this: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALe...But I'm pissed at Apple... Their actions recently have seemed so totalitarian.

There's zero evidence in that article to support its own claim, just wishful thinking by the author and the analyst.

Music in the clouds is inevitable. If Apple doesn't do it, Google will.

The entire history of commercial music has proved that music rental has NO mainstream potential whatsoever. Never has. Never will. Apple, the most (and really, only) successful company in the history of digital music, understands this - why are you so insistent in hyping the potential of an imaginary market that Apple and everyone outside the geek bubble knows doesn't exist?

You keep saying that the music rental market is not sustainable... but it sounds like you just don't understand what Lala did. The benefit to Lala is that you could OWN your music and play it from any network-attached computer. It's not renting anything. There's no subscription. Users did have an option to purchase access to a streaming-only version of the song, but it was also a store to purchase MP3s -- plus you could upload your music collection to play from anywhere. To me, this was the big benefit. I think there definitely is a market, but communicating it will be challenging because most people will have a hard time understanding it.

Lala was "rent to own" plan. The reason it went out of business (yes, it was set to shut down and approached Apple about a buyout, not the other way around), is because the geeks who were "renting" never were going back and "owning."Lala was a complete and total failure. It ended, looked for a buyer, Apple bought it strictly to add some engineers, stated to in an analyst conference call (in which you're not allowed to lie), and shut down the bankrupt service as promised, as the engineers were instead assigned to work on the ever-growing iTunes Store.Any other interpretation goes so willfully against the facts as to be considered delusional.

Marketing. Marketing. Marketing. If Apple makes it part of ITunes, their marketing will make this grow from 1.6 million to tens of millions. If 16 million go on the revenue jumps to $400 million.If 32 million adopt, the revenue jumps to $800 million, etc. This has huge potential.

Quantcast puts Lala at 1.6 million users. If each bought an average of one 8 cent song per day, that adds up to $128,000 per day. At 365 days per year, that adds up to about $40 million in revenue per year. Is that good enough for Apple or anyone else?It depends on the costs of running the operation, but if the number of users could grow, then the figures would rise even more. There is tremendously potential here. I just can't see yet how the service is eliminated permanently.

$40 million annually is a tiny sum of revenue not worth the time of day for a company as large as Apple. In fact it demonstrates just how little of a mainstream market there for rented music. Seven years into the iTunes Store, we have indisputable hard evidence that nearly all music fans are interested in purchasing music and only a relative handful of people are interested in renting it. The proof that music rentals have no future just keeps getting layered on (as evidenced by the fact that Lala was set to shut down if Apple didn't accept the buyout proposal, which was originated by Lala, not by Apple). You may prefer music rentals, but it doesn't change the fact that such a preference puts you in a tiny, tiny, tiny minority."I just can't see yet how the service is eliminated permanently."Uh, that's exactly what just happened today.

I am not so sure that Lala will not be rolled into Apple as a music sharing service.Is Apple already doing this and I am clueless? Just curious.

12 people? I think you are the one confused. Lala rocked. It was brilliant. Apple is evil.

Apple, I hate you. I really and truly hate you.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] won: it was obvious six years agoApril 30, 2010    Yet another digital music service has ceased to exist today, even as the iTunes Store continues to rake in a progressively larger chunk of overall music [...]

Bottom