With AT&T punting, Verizon iPhone more sorely needed than ever
June 2, 2010 by Bill Palmer
Apple often prefers to line up exclusive partners for new products so that the prospect of continued exclusivity can be hung over the partner’s head when need be. And when Verizon originally turned down the opportunity to be that exclusive partner for the iPhone, Apple instead gave the deal to AT&T. Which would be fine if AT&T could be threatened, prompted, or motivated to act like it had a pulse in any manner. Instead AT&T has turned out to be the kind of company that just doesn’t care one way or the other. Instead of enhancing its data network to accommodate the multitude of iPhone users who’ve been making the company rich, AT&T shrugs off any desire for continued growth and instead acts as if it would just as soon not have to deal with all those annoying paying customers. And now that the carrier has announced data usage caps on new iPhone customers, it couldn’t be more clear that AT&T doesn’t want any new iPhone customers.
With its iPhone army, Apple has seemingly exposed – unknowingly, most likely – what in hindsight should have been obvious. All U.S. cellphone carriers, AT&T included, have been skating by on terribly underserved networks for years, only managing to avoid those flaws being exposed due to the fact that most cellphone users, and even most smartphone users, have only ever taken advantage of a small fraction of what they’re paying for. And now that iPhone users have exposed the AT&T network for being the fraud that it is, AT&T would apparently rather simply give up and try to discourage people from switching to the iPhone, for fear that any more users on its pathetic network would cause the whole thing to come crashing down to the point that the company would in fact have to make significant investments in propping it back up; the company has instead made the calculation that it’s better not to bring on new iPhone users and continue limping along with its fractional network than to face the prospect of having to finally invest real money in its network, which judging by how paper-thin the network is currently, could involve real dollars and impact AT&T’s bottom line in the short term.
Make no mistake, other U.S. cellphone carriers (including Verizon) have networks just as horridly under-built as AT&T’s; it’s a racket that’s been going on for as long as the thoroughly unregulated U.S. cellular carrier industry has existed. The only difference here is that AT&T was dumb enough to take on the iPhone stampede with no understanding of the fact that iPhone users were by and large actually going to use the data capabilities of their devices in quantity. That having been said, it’s now clear that AT&T no longer wants new iPhone customers burdening its porcelain network, and so it’s now up to Apple to make a move which remedies this growing problem.
It’s a tribute to Apple that it managed to come up with a smartphone that people are actually using to do things with, but with AT&T slipping into a calculated coma when it comes to continuing to grow the iPhone userbase, Apple now has no choice but to shake up the landscape by offering the iPhone on more than one carrier. Doing so will cause Verizon’s equally porcelain network (or whichever carrier signs on next) to turn into a pumpkin in equally short order. But at least new iPhone users will have the opportunity to pick their poison. And such a move just might push AT&T and Verizon, who are in obvious collusion over the sad state of their cellular networks no matter how many television ads they may run in which they pretend to be competing with each other, to finally have to go ahead and compete with each other in terms of finally building twenty-first century cellular networks instead of the two cups and a string which (all) U.S. cellular networks can currently be compared to.
AT&T will do nothing to fix its network until it begins to feel the sting of losing current iPhone users to another carrier. Despite phony geek claims to the contrary, that’s not happening with Android or any other iPhone knockoff; it’ll only happen when the real thing is available elsewhere. It’s not that iPhone users will find any better of a network with Verizon if they shift over en masse; nor for that matter will they shift over en masse. But even a relatively minor exodus of iPhone users to another carrier, and the subsequent hit to their bottom line, just might b enough to bring AT&T out of its current coma and force the company to make the newly calculated decision to actually invest in its network. Absent any sense of wanting to make the world a better place, absent any business ethics of any kind, absent any whiff of government regulation, and yes, absent any effective maneuvering on Apple’s part thus far, these cellular carriers in here in the U.S. only understand one thing – money – and a Verizon iPhone could solve two problems in forcing AT&T to readjust its calculations in the face of losing customers while bringing the same crushing blow of data usage to Verizon’s equally inadequate network which might in turn force Verizon to think about investing in its own two cups and a string. The good news, then, is that a Verizon iPhone could reportedly be ready to go for Christmas 2010.



_V2.jpg)





Comments
See, I don't think spreading out the iPhone users over two networks is going to be incentive for either one to improve. We'll just have two companies having the same reactionary policy to network load vs one or both doing upgrades ahead of time.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeCOMPARING AT&T'S NEW RATES VERSUS VERIZON'S RATES:FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANS IN THE UNITED STATES:VERIZON:Unlimited Talk = $70 a monthUnlimited Text = $20 a month25 MB Data = $10 a month <--- STUPID. Almost all users will exceed this.5 GB Data = $30 a monthTethering = $30 a monthData over 5 GB = $0.05 per MB = $50 per GB.-----AT&T:Unlimited Talk = $70 a monthUnlimited Text = $20 a month200 MB Data = $15 a month <--- covers 68% of iPhone users.2 GB Data = $25 a month <--- covers 98% of iPhone users.3 GB Data = $35 a monthTethering = $20 a monthData over 5 GB = $0.05 per MB = $50 per GB.-----NOTES:AT&T's rates are very favorable compared to Verizon's rates.AT&T's Tethering rate is less than Verizon'sFor the 98% of users who use less than 2 GB a month, AT&T is $5 a month cheaper than Verizon, saving $60 a year. With tethering, AT&T is $15 a month cheaper than Verizon, saving $180 a year.Ideally, AT&T should also have a limit of 5 GB a month, like Verizon. This makes it easier to use video conferencing on the new iPhones. After all, AT&T in the 1970s did envision someday having video conferencing on phones. The 5GB limit would still be a good cutoff point for heavy data users.But AT&T new plans for 98 % of users are better than Verizon's plans.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeiPhone= Mediocre for data, horrible for voice. Your mom can handle an iPhone. Get yourself a Droid or a Google phone.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likegood article. I use my iphone for news in the morning, pandora during the day, and games on my commute. of the 25 days in my billing cycle i have already used 677MB. I'm glad I am already a customer and while initially i thought i would switch to verizon when it becomes available i now think that i'll wait for everyone else to get off of AT&T and enjoy less dropped calls. AT&T is by far the best international carrier and, to me, has the best customer service, so please leave AT&T and improve my service. Thanks,
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@Knowledge is PowerYou're one of the people I would rather not pay taxes for. Please get a job.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHere is a little tid bit. I use a blackberry to tether my laptop over the verizon network. I play world of warcraft over the network with better speed and better latency than I get with comcast upgraded cable internet. At the same time I play about 6-8 hours a day most days and surf the web and run IM programs on top of that. And unless I stream videos or download stuff, I have yet to use more than 500mbs of data out of the 5gbs of data I pay 15 a month for. Not to mention I can use this service anywhere I have signal and a place to plug my laptop in. Now plain data usage per month on my phone (seperate from tethering data), I can easily use over the 2gbs of data AT&T now initially gives and going on vacation without my laptop I've reached over 3gbs pushing 4. Now give me an iphone, htc, or a droid and that data usuage will have a huge increase. For a younger generation (myself being 22) data consumtion is an everyday thing. Picture messaging, video messaging, internet browsing, IM programs, and the many data consuming apps. And there is so many more ways of data consumption out and even more coming out. But that's all just plain fact and I'm not posting to push an opinion. Just take into account the possibilities and not just base opinions on just your own data usage.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt's ridiculous to call AT&Ts network pathetic: they're carrying 75-80 more traffic than any other carrier, spending $15-18 billion on upgrades this year and currently have the fastest rated 3G. The new rate plans? They will save me ~$45 a month. I'll take that gladly. Put millions of iPhones on another carriers network and see how they fare, then maybe a fair comparison can be made.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWow, do you have any sort of references or sources? Or did you figure I'll just right a whole article straight out of my ass and treat it as fact. Anyone who reads this and takes it for fact is a moron. While I agree AT&T has problems with their networks they are putting money into upgrading it (I am not an AT&T fan btw). Verizon is putting even more money then AT&T into their network upgrades and haven't shown any problems with handling data on their network yet. There is absolutely no evidence that verizon's network wouldn't be able to handle the iPhone. I can't believe I wasted 5 minutes reading this POS article
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@ Greg:which means they'll be using more bandwidth. If those people would like to try and dodge paying their internet bill, then they should pay for the extra data usage through the phone company. What people aren't realizing is that data usage on a Wi-Fi network is not counted in the 200mb/2gb limit. Therefore, yes, most people use below 2gb and my wife and I use less than 200 mb! I'm all for not having to pay for other people skipping out on an internet bill.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeUmm, here is the bold faced LIE about all of this. "Data" used on a phone is dumbed down. Youtube streaming, websites, downloads, you name it, it is all compressed. So to say that most users use less than "2GB" a month is only true because phones can't download large files (like movies) or stream youtube or hulu at full quality. Once tethering becomes mainstream the way cell-internet is becoming, users will start abandoning their comcast/dsl internets at home for cellular wireless. Once that happens, they'll be using 100s of GBs, because... they already do!!!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLoved your article. Great info.... Not really loving the Bill Palmer pic though... I could comment more on it but that would be mean.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'd agree almost fully with this article and I think it's a great stance on cell phone companies. Although I think Verizon's network would be much more able to handle the iPhone craze over At&T's
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou agree with the article? Then you have something in common with the moron who wrote it, neither of you are smart enough to own the equipment you wrote/read the article on. Verzion runs CDMA and can't really match the speeds that 3G can produce (I am not saying that AT&T is using what 3G can produce, I am saying that Verizon running CDMA could never match it). The network complaint will be over soon anyway because people (both AT&T and Verizon) are moving to LTE (but Sprint who is trying Wiimax). Understand the term soon, like 3-7 years, and not because the phone companies can't move faster, but because the lovely government has their hands in the pie. Besides its the iPhone, its just a repackage of things other phones could do, it brought nothing to the table. FYI: AT&T's contract with Apple runs until 2012, so Verizon iPhone by the end of 2010? Not likely
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI have to admit, I didn't read the whole article; I got bored after the first paragraph. I have, though, seen people's reactions to this new pricing structure and I'm confused. I like the new structure. I checked my data usage and I haven't gone over 120 megabytes since I'm usually in a wifi hotspot when using my iPhone. So now I only have to pay 15 instead of 30 per month extra. In other words, let those who use more data pay for the data they use, rather than spreading the cost out evenly over everyone regardless of usage. I don't feel like paying extra so that others can use more data, just like I don't feel like paying more taxes so that others don't have to work.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeexcellent article
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGreat addition to the conversation!! Your insight to the subject is as amazing as the BP Cleanup Effort.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like