<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: ATH-ANC3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatweek.com/iphone/ipodiphoneitunes/1694-review-audio-technica-ath-anc3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatweek.com/iphone/ipodiphoneitunes/1694-review-audio-technica-ath-anc3/</link>
	<description>the publication for iPod and iPhone users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt French</title>
		<link>http://www.beatweek.com/iphone/ipodiphoneitunes/1694-review-audio-technica-ath-anc3/comment-page-1/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iprong.com/?p=1694#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>I got away from the noise canceling style years ago but came up with an even more compact, higher fidelity solution: canal plugs.

I long ago settled on the Etymotic ER4-P&#039;s -- it was a Wozniak post back in the bulletin board days that turned me onto them -- but Shure and other better-known shops make &#039;em, too.

Advantages: better noise isolation than the &quot;noise canceling&quot; style, better fidelity, too. (An audiophile type I follow put them at the number 2 position on his list, bettered only by bulky studio-quality phones.)

Disadvantages: some people don&#039;t like the feel of things so far into their ears; the isolation can be dangerous, even illegal, in traffic. Definitely not for bikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got away from the noise canceling style years ago but came up with an even more compact, higher fidelity solution: canal plugs.</p>
<p>I long ago settled on the Etymotic ER4-P&#8217;s &#8212; it was a Wozniak post back in the bulletin board days that turned me onto them &#8212; but Shure and other better-known shops make &#8216;em, too.</p>
<p>Advantages: better noise isolation than the &#8220;noise canceling&#8221; style, better fidelity, too. (An audiophile type I follow put them at the number 2 position on his list, bettered only by bulky studio-quality phones.)</p>
<p>Disadvantages: some people don&#8217;t like the feel of things so far into their ears; the isolation can be dangerous, even illegal, in traffic. Definitely not for bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.041 seconds using disk

Served from: agaacqsgie.c04.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-15 14:14:14 -->